Ever wonder what your clients really think about the engagement process? This exclusive webinar explores Suralink's latest original research and provides a fresh perspective on the engagement experience, revealing what matters most to your clients.
This webinar will allow you to:
Here is a website-ready summary of the benchmark report presented during the webinar:
Accounting firms are facing intense pressures from all sides, ranging from unprecedented market competition and rapid consolidation to capacity crunches fueled by severe talent shortages. To survive this high-volume environment, firms have historically focused internal investments on data security and regulatory compliance. However, independent third-party market research surveying hundreds of corporate client users reveals a massive, hidden hurdle directly limiting a firm's bottom line: the client readiness gap.
This client readiness gap represents a major misalignment in expectations, priorities, and daily communication between firms and the clients they serve. Across the industry, over 30% of accounting firm engagements fail to finish on time and on budget (a pernicious baseline that directly depresses firm realization rates and strains professional relationships regardless of firm size or practice area).
The report establishes a critical distinction regarding client satisfaction: the friction is in the how of the work, not the what. Not a single client surveyed expressed concern over the final financial statement, audit opinion, or tax return; accuracy and data compliance are treated as absolute table stakes. Instead, the real pain stems entirely from a broken client journey riddled with administrative burdens, disjointed email chains, and persistent miscommunications.
The benchmark data highlights that client loyalty is incredibly fragile:
Firms often mistake slow client turnaround times for deliberate stalling or lack of care; however, the data proves that clients are simply in survival mode. Fully 75% of clients report struggling to balance active accounting engagements with their core day-to-day responsibilities.
The operational reality follows a punishing "two-for-one" dynamic: for every two hours an accounting team spends on an engagement, the corporate client must spend one hour gathering files, verifying data, or answering questions. If a firm dedicates 40 hours to an audit or tax project in a single week, a client controller is forced to burn 20 hours of their own time thus layering half a full work week of context switching on top of closing books and managing business operations. Corporate controllers frequently note that active engagements add 10 or more hours to their weekly plates, turning a baseline accounting requirement into an exhausting second job.
When asked to design an ideal request management process, clients do not want complex, all-in-one generic platforms that try to execute everything but do nothing well. Clients are highly localized users: a massive 70% of a client's total interactive time with a firm is spent strictly inside the document submission portal. Because they spend the vast majority of their time there, 77% of clients state a definitive preference for a dedicated, specialized, best-in-class portal over a broad, unified system.
To eliminate the document bottlenecks that drag out engagements, clients explicitly look for structural changes centered around a single, centralized shared environment:
The benchmark report concludes with a look at emerging technologies, presenting a surprising paradigm shift in corporate client expectations. Rather than fearing artificial intelligence, clients view native automation as an essential tool to restore their internal capacity. Clients report high levels of comfort with accounting firms deploying AI, provided the technology actively intercepts the rework cycle, automates repetitive document chasers, or flags discrepancies early in the life cycle. In fact, clients view this friction reduction as a quantifiable value add, signaling a clear willingness to pay higher fees to firms that leverage advanced portals to take emails and rework off their plates.
However, the report carries a strict warning from a recent MIT enterprise study: 95% of generic generative AI pilots fail to yield a measurable return on investment. Forcing an accounting team to use generalized assistants like Microsoft Copilot or ChatGPT delivers little bottom-line impact because those platforms are not mapped to industry-specific processes. In contrast, the study showed a 67% higher rate of enterprise success when firms deliberately partner with third-party software vendors who embed specialized, native AI directly into core compliance and request workflows. By aligning specialized point solutions through modern APIs and secure automation, leading firms can insulate their profit margins, optimize practitioner capacity, and capture lasting market loyalty.